Warren (Maritimes) Ltd. v. New Brunswick (Minister of the Environment), 1997 CanLII 9479 (NB QB)

This case was heard in the New Brunswick Court of Queen's Bench (Trial Division).

Warren (Maritimes) Ltd. ("Warren") operated an asphalt plant in an area that had, over time, been surrounded by a residential subdivision. The asphalt plant was licensed by the Minister of the Environment in 1993, and in 1996 the Minister decided not to renew the Approval to Operate. The subdivision residents had made complaints about the noise and dust produced by the plant, among other things, and the Minister took their complaints into account when he chose not to renew the plant’s license.

Warren applied for judicial review of the Minister’s decision, and the Court held that the decision was invalid, as it had been made “on the basis of wrong principles or for irrelevant considerations.” The Court stated that because there was no proof that the asphalt plant was causing health or environmental problems, the problem was essentially a social issue—one relating to land use and zoning rather than to the issues captured by New Brunswick’s Clean Environment Act. For this reason, the Court held that the Minister had taken wrong principles or irrelevant considerations into account when choosing not to renew the plant's license.

View the Decision on CanLII: https://www.canlii.org/en/nb/nbqb/doc/1997/1997canlii9479/1997canlii9479.html

Disclaimer:
Case briefs in our Resource Library are drafted by law students who work or volunteer with East Coast Environmental Law, and East Coast Environmental Law does not guarantee their fullness or accuracy. Library users should not rely on case briefs as comprehensive accounts of the issues, facts, reasoning, or outcomes at stake in any given case. 

If you require more detailed information about a court decision or legal issue, please consider using our Environmental Law Inquiry Service to request information from our staff.

Previous
Previous

R. v. Tors Cove Excavating Ltd, 1994 CanLII 10300 (NL SCTD)

Next
Next

R v Marshall, 1997 CanLII 14992 (NS CA)