This application for leave to appeal was considered by the Supreme Court of Canada.

Superline Fuels Inc. entered into a contract to supply an install a domestic oil tank, and it then hired a subcontractor, Mr. Buchanan, to carry out the work. About nine months after the oil tank had been installed, a leak was discovered. The homeowner sued Superline Fuels, who in turn sued Mr. Buchanan. Before Superline Fuels initiated legal proceedings against Mr. Buchanan, Mr. Buchanan had declared bankruptcy, and soon after Superline Fuels initiated the legal proceedings against him, Mr. Buchanan was granted an absolute discharge from bankruptcy. Superline Fuels applied to the Court to determine whether Mr. Buchanan’s absolute discharge made it impossible for the company to recover its losses from Mr. Buchanan’s insurer, Dominion of Canada General Insurance Co.

After considering the relevant law and legal principles, the Supreme Court of Nova Scotia held that the absolute discharge could not prevent Superline Fuels from continuing its legal proceedings against Mr. Buchanan in the hope of recovering its losses from Mr. Buchanan’s insurer. When Mr. Buchanan and his insurer appealed to the Nova Scotia Court of Appeal, the Court held that although the lower court had interpreted certain court orders incorrectly, it had not erred in its interpretation of the relevant law. The Court therefore upheld the lower court’s decision.

When Mr. Buchanan and his insurer sought leave to appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada, leave to appeal was denied.

To read earlier decisions related to this case, go to Buchanan v. Superline Fuels Inc., 2006 NSSC 51 (CanLII) and Buchanan v. Superline Fuels Inc., 2007 NSCA 68 (CanLII).

View the Decision on CanLII: https://www.canlii.org/en/ca/scc-l/doc/2007/2007canlii55340/2007canlii55340.html

Disclaimer:
Case briefs in our Resource Library are drafted by law students who work or volunteer with East Coast Environmental Law, and East Coast Environmental Law does not guarantee their fullness or accuracy. Library users should not rely on case briefs as comprehensive accounts of the issues, facts, reasoning, or outcomes at stake in any given case. 

If you require more detailed information about a court decision or legal issue, please consider using our Environmental Law Inquiry Service to request information from our staff.