This case was heard in the New Brunswick Court of Appeal.

After the Isbills were convicted in Provincial Court of having failed to obtain a permit before undertaking a watercourse or wetland alteration, the Isbills appealed to the New Brunswick Court of Queen’s Bench. After reviewing the relevant provisions of the Clean Water Act, the Court held that the Crown had failed to prove that the Isbills’ activities—which involved cutting trees along the banks of a small watercourse on their property—were prohibited by the Act. The Court therefore set aside the convictions that had been handed down by the Provincial Court.

The Crown appealed to the New Brunswick Court of Appeal, which reviewed the record and the relevant law and legal principles and held that Court of Queen’s Bench had erred in applying inappropriate interpretive principles to the Clean Water Act. By contrast, the Court of Appeal held that the Isbill’s activities were clearly prohibited by the Act, and it restored the Provincial Court’s conviction and sentence accordingly.

To read about this case in the New Brunswick Court of Queen’s Bench, go to Isbill et al. v. R., 2005 NBQB 442 (CanLII).

View the Decision on CanLII: https://www.canlii.org/en/nb/nbca/doc/2006/2006nbca107/2006nbca107.html

Disclaimer:
Case briefs in our Resource Library are drafted by law students who work or volunteer with East Coast Environmental Law, and East Coast Environmental Law does not guarantee their fullness or accuracy. Library users should not rely on case briefs as comprehensive accounts of the issues, facts, reasoning, or outcomes at stake in any given case. 

If you require more detailed information about a court decision or legal issue, please consider using our Environmental Law Inquiry Service to request information from our staff.