Quigley v Torbay (Town), 2009 NLTD 32 (CanLII)

This case was heard in the Supreme Court of Newfoundland and Labrador (Trial Division).

In 2000, Mr. Quigley applied for a one-year permit to operate a quarry in Torbay. The Town chose not to approve the application, and there then began a long chain of legal proceedings involving multiple appeals to the Eastern Regional Appeal Board and the Supreme Court of Newfoundland and Labrador.

In 2004, Mr. Quigley initiated an appeal to the Supreme Court of Newfoundland and Labrador, and in 2006, after filing a Notice of Intention to Proceed with that appeal, he also applied for judicial review by way of certiorari and mandamus. After the Town of Torbay protested against the concurrent appeal and application for judicial review, Mr. Quigley indicated his intention to abandon the appeal and proceed with the application for judicial review alone.

After considering the history of the case and the relevant laws and legal principles, the Court held that Mr. Quigley was not entitled to abandon his appeal and proceed by way of judicial review instead, as the legislation that was relevant to Mr. Quigley’s case made it clear that disputes could be addressed by way of appeal, and there was therefore an adequate  remedy available to Mr. Quigley. The Court therefore refused the application for judicial review and held that the matter should proceed by way of appeal as Mr. Quigley had initially intended.

To read related decisions, go to Quigley v. Torbay (Town), 2002 CanLII 61681 (NL SCTD) and Quigley v. Torbay (Town), 2010 NLCA 3 (CanLII)

View the Decision on CanLII: https://www.canlii.org/en/nl/nlsctd/doc/2009/2009nltd32/2009nltd32.html

Disclaimer:
Case briefs in our Resource Library are drafted by law students who work or volunteer with East Coast Environmental Law, and East Coast Environmental Law does not guarantee their fullness or accuracy. Library users should not rely on case briefs as comprehensive accounts of the issues, facts, reasoning, or outcomes at stake in any given case. 

If you require more detailed information about a court decision or legal issue, please consider using our Environmental Law Inquiry Service to request information from our staff.

Previous
Previous

Debly Construction Ltd. v. R., 2009 NBQB 105 (CanLII)

Next
Next

R. v. Douglas Projects International, 2008 NSPC 76 (CanLII)