This case was heard in the Supreme Court of Nova Scotia.

The Juurlinks owned farmland in a watershed area in Hants County, Nova Scotia that was subject to certain regulations under Nova Scotia’s Water Act. When the Juurlinks listed their property for sale in 2000, the Municipality of East Hants raised concerns about it being used for agricultural purposes in the future. The Juurlinks claimed that the Municipality's concerns had adversely affected their property value and their ability to sell the land, and they requested that the Court appoint an arbitrator to consider their claim for injurious affection.

Previously, the provincial Water Act had provided for the appointment of arbitrators in such circumstances; however, Nova Scotia’s Environment Act had repealed the relevant provision of the Water Act and barred claims for injurious affection resulting from “a designation of a protected water area.” The Court therefore had to determine whether the relevant provision in the Environment Act applied retroactively, extinguishing a legal right that the Juurlinks had previously held.

After considering the relevant law and legal principles, the Court held that the Environment Act could not be applied retroactively to extinguish the Juurlinks’ established legal right, and so it appointed an arbitrator to consider their claim for injurious affection.

View the Decision on CanLII: https://www.canlii.org/en/ns/nssc/doc/2001/2001nssc159/2001nssc159.html

Disclaimer:
Case briefs in our Resource Library are drafted by law students who work or volunteer with East Coast Environmental Law, and East Coast Environmental Law does not guarantee their fullness or accuracy. Library users should not rely on case briefs as comprehensive accounts of the issues, facts, reasoning, or outcomes at stake in any given case. 

If you require more detailed information about a court decision or legal issue, please consider using our Environmental Law Inquiry Service to request information from our staff.