East Coast Environmental Law

View Original

Homburg Canada Inc. v. Nova Scotia (Utility and Review Board), 2010 NSCA 24 (CanLII)

This case was heard in the Nova Scotia Court of Appeal.

After the Halifax Regional Water Commission ordered Homburg Canada Inc. ("Homburg") to install a backflow prevention device on its commercial property, Homburg appealed the Commission’s decision. The Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board considered the Commission’s decision in a hearing, where it dismissed Homburg’s complaint. In addition to dismissing Homburg’s complaint, however, the Board also concluded that the Commission needed to use more flexibility when handling complaints like Homburg’s, and it ordered the Commission to revise its internal policies.

Both Homburg and the Commission appealed to the Nova Scotia Court of Appeal. After considering the merits of each complaint, the Court dismissed both appeals. It held that the Board had acted within its jurisdiction when dismissing Homburg’s complaints, and it also held that the Board had not acted unreasonably in ordering the Commission to revise its internal policies.

View the Decision on CanLII: https://www.canlii.org/en/ns/nsca/doc/2010/2010nsca24/2010nsca24.html

Disclaimer:
Case briefs in our Resource Library are drafted by law students who work or volunteer with East Coast Environmental Law, and East Coast Environmental Law does not guarantee their fullness or accuracy. Library users should not rely on case briefs as comprehensive accounts of the issues, facts, reasoning, or outcomes at stake in any given case. 

If you require more detailed information about a court decision or legal issue, please consider using our Environmental Law Inquiry Service to request information from our staff.