Brighton v. Nova Scotia, 2002 NSSC 160 (CanLII)

This case was heard in the Supreme Court of Nova Scotia.

In 2001, Nova Scotia’s Minister of Agriculture and Fisheries approved an application by Aquafish Technology Inc. to develop a fish farm in Northwest Cove. Provisions in Nova Scotia’s Fisheries and Coastal Resources Act made it possible for aggrieved parties to appeal the Minister’s decision in the Supreme Court of Nova Scotia. When a group of concerned citizens appealed to the Court as aggrieved parties, the Court determined that the appropriate standard by which to review the Minister’s decision was “at least reasonableness simpliciter if not patent unreasonableness.” In other words, the Court held that it should show considerable deference to the Minister when evaluating the Minister’s decision.

After evaluating the Minister’s decision, the Court held that it was not unreasonable, as it was neither arbitrary nor made in bad faith. The appellants’ appeal was therefore dismissed.

View the Decision on CanLII: https://www.canlii.org/en/ns/nssc/doc/2002/2002nssc160/2002nssc160.html

Disclaimer:
Case briefs in our Resource Library are drafted by law students who work or volunteer with East Coast Environmental Law, and East Coast Environmental Law does not guarantee their fullness or accuracy. Library users should not rely on case briefs as comprehensive accounts of the issues, facts, reasoning, or outcomes at stake in any given case. 

If you require more detailed information about a court decision or legal issue, please consider using our Environmental Law Inquiry Service to request information from our staff.

Previous
Previous

Allen v. Conception Bay South (Town Council), 2002 CanLII 45645 (NL SCTD)

Next
Next

Annapolis (Municipality of the County) v. Hankinson, 2002 NSSC 149 (CanLII)