Acheson & DeWolfe v. Minister of Environment, 2006 NSSC 211 (CanLII)

This case was heard in the Supreme Court of Nova Scotia.

Ms. Acheson and Mr. DeWolfe’s property bordered a body of water called the Marshall Flowage. To prevent flooding on their property, they constructed an infill and a rock wall to create a barrier between the water and their land. After the infill and rock wall were constructed, the they submitted an application for watercourse alteration approval to the Nova Scotia Department of Environment and Labour ("NSEL"). NSEL did not approve the application, as it found that the infill and rock wall could have adverse effects on the local aquatic environment and ecosystems and were therefore in conflict with Nova Scotia’s Water Act and Environment Act.

When the case came before the Supreme Court of Nova Scotia, the appellants argued that Marshall Flowage is not a natural watercourse, and so is not subject to the rules that NSEL relied on when it chose not to approve their application. The Court rejected their argument and held that Marshall Flowage is a watercourse that is protected by the Water Act and Environment Act.

View the Decision on CanLII: https://www.canlii.org/en/ns/nssc/doc/2006/2006nssc211/2006nssc211.html

Disclaimer:
Case briefs in our Resource Library are drafted by law students who work or volunteer with East Coast Environmental Law, and East Coast Environmental Law does not guarantee their fullness or accuracy. Library users should not rely on case briefs as comprehensive accounts of the issues, facts, reasoning, or outcomes at stake in any given case. 

If you require more detailed information about a court decision or legal issue, please consider using our Environmental Law Inquiry Service to request information from our staff.

Previous
Previous

Halifax (Regional Municipality) v. Ed DeWolfe Trucking Ltd., 2006 NSSC 287 (CanLII)

Next
Next

Cousins v. McColl-Frontenac Inc., 2006 NBQB 255 (CanLII)